<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tabriz</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Modern Psychological Researches</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2322-3340</Issn>
				<Volume>3</Volume>
				<Issue>12</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2009</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>ویژگی شخصیتی، اعتیاد،HIV.</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>ویژگی شخصیتی، اعتیاد،HIV.</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>1</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>15</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">4321</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Akram</FirstName>
					<LastName>Arji</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Abbas</FirstName>
					<LastName>Bakhshipour Roudsari</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Majid</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mahmoud Aliloo</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Bahram</FirstName>
					<LastName>Samady Rad</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>27</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The purpose of this research was to compare personality traits in HIV positive addicted patients and normal group. The sample in this study consists of 100 Participants (50 HIV+ addict and 50 normal group). They were selected by using the stratified sampling method. The normal groups were matched with the HIV positive addicted patients concerning the demographic characteristics. Participants were asked to complete the sensation seeking Inventory form V (SSS). Analysis of the data was based on the multiple-analysis of variance. The results revealed that there was significant difference between HIV positive addicted patients and normal group in personality traits score. It can be concluded, there is personality pathways (high neuroticism score and low scores in extraversion, openness, agreeableness and conscientiousness) to HIV infection and addiction.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The purpose of this research was to compare personality traits in HIV positive addicted patients and normal group. The sample in this study consists of 100 Participants (50 HIV+ addict and 50 normal group). They were selected by using the stratified sampling method. The normal groups were matched with the HIV positive addicted patients concerning the demographic characteristics. Participants were asked to complete the sensation seeking Inventory form V (SSS). Analysis of the data was based on the multiple-analysis of variance. The results revealed that there was significant difference between HIV positive addicted patients and normal group in personality traits score. It can be concluded, there is personality pathways (high neuroticism score and low scores in extraversion, openness, agreeableness and conscientiousness) to HIV infection and addiction.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Personality traits</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Addict</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">HIV</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://psychologyj.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_4321_44d37b6ea1c1b786ad398d6fe6900be8.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tabriz</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Modern Psychological Researches</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2322-3340</Issn>
				<Volume>3</Volume>
				<Issue>12</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2009</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>A Comparison of Personality Dimensions, Type C and Coping Strategies in Cancer Patients and Normal Groups</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>A Comparison of Personality Dimensions, Type C and Coping Strategies in Cancer Patients and Normal Groups</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>17</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>39</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">4322</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mansour</FirstName>
					<LastName>Bayrami</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Fatemeh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Nemati Sogolitappeh</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>27</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The aim of this research was comparing the personality dimensions, type C and coping strategies in cancer patients and normal groups. The sample of this study consist of 100 participants (50 cancer patients and 50 without cancer). They were selected by using the stratified random sampling method. The normal groups were matched with the cancer group concerning the demographic characteristics (age, sexuality and education). Participants were asked to complete the Eysenck’s personality questionnaire, type C and coping style inventories. Analysis of the data was based on the multiple- analysis of variance (MANOVA). The results revealed that neuroticism, extroversion (P&lt;0/01), psychoticism, type C (P&lt;0/05) and emotional-focused coping(P&lt;0/01) scores of cancer patients significantly were higher than non-cancer individuals. Also, the results revealed that there was no significant difference between both group in problem solving coping.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The aim of this research was comparing the personality dimensions, type C and coping strategies in cancer patients and normal groups. The sample of this study consist of 100 participants (50 cancer patients and 50 without cancer). They were selected by using the stratified random sampling method. The normal groups were matched with the cancer group concerning the demographic characteristics (age, sexuality and education). Participants were asked to complete the Eysenck’s personality questionnaire, type C and coping style inventories. Analysis of the data was based on the multiple- analysis of variance (MANOVA). The results revealed that neuroticism, extroversion (P&lt;0/01), psychoticism, type C (P&lt;0/05) and emotional-focused coping(P&lt;0/01) scores of cancer patients significantly were higher than non-cancer individuals. Also, the results revealed that there was no significant difference between both group in problem solving coping.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Personality dimensions</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Type C</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Coping style</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Cancer</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://psychologyj.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_4322_ba06ac28bb9b70eab1d47732865ad42e.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tabriz</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Modern Psychological Researches</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2322-3340</Issn>
				<Volume>3</Volume>
				<Issue>12</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2009</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Creativity in Children: The Study of Causal Model of Perceived Control, Motivational Styles, Creativity</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Creativity in Children: The Study of Causal Model of Perceived Control, Motivational Styles, Creativity</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>41</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>67</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">4323</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Bahram</FirstName>
					<LastName>Jowkar</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Khayyer</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mahbobeh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Alborzi</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>27</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This study examined relations among perceived control and motivational styles and creativity in a sample of 132 students in 4&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; and 5&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; grade in Shiraz school. Specifically, the hypothesis of the study was that motivational self-regulation styles (i.e., intrinsic, identified, interjected, and extrinsic) are mediator variables between perceived control and creativity. Results of simultaneous multiple regression confirmed the research hypothesis. Specifically strategy beliefs about effort and others powerful positively predicted extrinsic regulation and capacity beliefs about effort and ability negatively predicted extrinsic regulation. Also, strategy beliefs about others powerful positively predicted introjected regulation. In addition strategy beliefs about effort, unknown negatively and others powerful and capacity beliefs about ability positively predicted identified regulation. Finally, strategy beliefs about ability positively and unknown strategy and capacity beliefs about chance negatively predicted intrinsic regulation. Results also showed that introjected regulation negatively and identified style positively predicted creativity. Overall, the model strongly predicted creativity and adherence to the motivational style and perceived were particularly important. At the end, the conclusion and implications of results were presented.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">This study examined relations among perceived control and motivational styles and creativity in a sample of 132 students in 4&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; and 5&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; grade in Shiraz school. Specifically, the hypothesis of the study was that motivational self-regulation styles (i.e., intrinsic, identified, interjected, and extrinsic) are mediator variables between perceived control and creativity. Results of simultaneous multiple regression confirmed the research hypothesis. Specifically strategy beliefs about effort and others powerful positively predicted extrinsic regulation and capacity beliefs about effort and ability negatively predicted extrinsic regulation. Also, strategy beliefs about others powerful positively predicted introjected regulation. In addition strategy beliefs about effort, unknown negatively and others powerful and capacity beliefs about ability positively predicted identified regulation. Finally, strategy beliefs about ability positively and unknown strategy and capacity beliefs about chance negatively predicted intrinsic regulation. Results also showed that introjected regulation negatively and identified style positively predicted creativity. Overall, the model strongly predicted creativity and adherence to the motivational style and perceived were particularly important. At the end, the conclusion and implications of results were presented.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Creativity</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Perceived Control</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Motivational styles</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://psychologyj.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_4323_681862aa4e303dbc33ec0e07086e0d08.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tabriz</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Modern Psychological Researches</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2322-3340</Issn>
				<Volume>3</Volume>
				<Issue>12</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2009</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Classification and Identification of  the Most Important Marriage Pathologies between Couples in Isfahan</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Classification and Identification of  the Most Important Marriage Pathologies between Couples in Isfahan</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>69</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>100</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">4324</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Farahnaz</FirstName>
					<LastName>Rahmatollahi</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Maryam</FirstName>
					<LastName>Fatehizadeh</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>S.Ahmad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Ahmadi</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>27</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The aim of this research was to classify and recognize of the most important marital problems in Isfahan. This survey research is an epidemiologic study. The samples were included 500 married people (405 women &amp; 95 men) selected as cluster sampling from those who refered to medical centers in Isfahan in 2006. The research instrument was a researcher-made questionnaire with 231 questions, in the form of 26 micro scales to evaluate all aspects of marital problems. The Cronbach coefficient Alpha of the questionnaire was 0.98. The data were analyzed by SPSS soft ware. The methods analyze of this research are descriptive statistics (frequency, percentage, mean &amp; standard deviation) and inferential statistics (one sample T test). The results were as follows:                    
Three marriage groups that called:, &quot;without problem&quot;, &quot;faced to problem&quot; and &quot;with problem&quot; were recognized, according to standard deviation.84/2% of the sample were without problem group. This group had a score less than one standard deviation.11/4% of the sample were faced to problem group. This group had a score between one and two standard deviation.4/4% of the sample were with problem group. This group had a score more than two standard deviation. The marital problems in these groups were ranked according to frequency percentage. In without problem and faced to problem groups, the &quot;communication problems&quot; and &quot;communication models&quot; had the highest rank. In with problem group, the &quot;behavior problems with the partner&quot; and &quot;emotional problems&quot; had the highest rank. Among different domains of marital problems,6 domains including: &quot;behavior problems with the partner&quot;, &quot;emotional problems&quot;, &quot;difference in personality characteristics&quot;, &quot;problems related to having time out&quot;, &quot;communication problems&quot; and &quot;communication models&quot; were recognized as the most important marital problems among couples in Isfahan.   </Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The aim of this research was to classify and recognize of the most important marital problems in Isfahan. This survey research is an epidemiologic study. The samples were included 500 married people (405 women &amp; 95 men) selected as cluster sampling from those who refered to medical centers in Isfahan in 2006. The research instrument was a researcher-made questionnaire with 231 questions, in the form of 26 micro scales to evaluate all aspects of marital problems. The Cronbach coefficient Alpha of the questionnaire was 0.98. The data were analyzed by SPSS soft ware. The methods analyze of this research are descriptive statistics (frequency, percentage, mean &amp; standard deviation) and inferential statistics (one sample T test). The results were as follows:                    
Three marriage groups that called:, &quot;without problem&quot;, &quot;faced to problem&quot; and &quot;with problem&quot; were recognized, according to standard deviation.84/2% of the sample were without problem group. This group had a score less than one standard deviation.11/4% of the sample were faced to problem group. This group had a score between one and two standard deviation.4/4% of the sample were with problem group. This group had a score more than two standard deviation. The marital problems in these groups were ranked according to frequency percentage. In without problem and faced to problem groups, the &quot;communication problems&quot; and &quot;communication models&quot; had the highest rank. In with problem group, the &quot;behavior problems with the partner&quot; and &quot;emotional problems&quot; had the highest rank. Among different domains of marital problems,6 domains including: &quot;behavior problems with the partner&quot;, &quot;emotional problems&quot;, &quot;difference in personality characteristics&quot;, &quot;problems related to having time out&quot;, &quot;communication problems&quot; and &quot;communication models&quot; were recognized as the most important marital problems among couples in Isfahan.   </OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Marital pathology</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">without problem marriage</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Faced to problem marriage</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">with problem marriage</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://psychologyj.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_4324_3e2c5656a392aeed77e814952f8ab93d.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tabriz</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Modern Psychological Researches</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2322-3340</Issn>
				<Volume>3</Volume>
				<Issue>12</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2009</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Academic Stressors and Reactions to Stressors: Testing the Mediating Effects of Coping Styles</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Academic Stressors and Reactions to Stressors: Testing the Mediating Effects of Coping Styles</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>101</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>122</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">4325</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Fariborz</FirstName>
					<LastName>Geravand</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Omid</FirstName>
					<LastName>Shokri</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>27</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This study examined the mediating effect of coping styles on the relationship between academic stressors and reactions to stressors. On a sample consisting of 419 students (166 male 235 female) were administrated the Student-Life Stress Inventory (SLSI) and the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situation (CISS). Structural equation modeling was used to assess the relationships among latent and measured variables in the conceptual model. In the both models, results indicated that there is a significant positive correlation between academic stressors and reactions to stressors and emotion-oriented coping style. A significant negative correlation was found between academic stressors and task-oriented coping style. Results also indicated that the relationship between academic stressors and reactions to stressors by task and emotion oriented coping styles is mediated. All of the regression weights in the both models were statistically significant, and models&#039; predictors accounted for 75% of the variance in reaction to stressors. The findings emphasize the need to recognize the mediating role of coping styles in examining relationship between academic stressors and reactions to stressors. Implications of these results are discussed for educational psychologists.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">This study examined the mediating effect of coping styles on the relationship between academic stressors and reactions to stressors. On a sample consisting of 419 students (166 male 235 female) were administrated the Student-Life Stress Inventory (SLSI) and the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situation (CISS). Structural equation modeling was used to assess the relationships among latent and measured variables in the conceptual model. In the both models, results indicated that there is a significant positive correlation between academic stressors and reactions to stressors and emotion-oriented coping style. A significant negative correlation was found between academic stressors and task-oriented coping style. Results also indicated that the relationship between academic stressors and reactions to stressors by task and emotion oriented coping styles is mediated. All of the regression weights in the both models were statistically significant, and models&#039; predictors accounted for 75% of the variance in reaction to stressors. The findings emphasize the need to recognize the mediating role of coping styles in examining relationship between academic stressors and reactions to stressors. Implications of these results are discussed for educational psychologists.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Academic Stressors</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Reactions to Stressors</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Coping styles</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Mediator</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Structural equation modeling (SEM)</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://psychologyj.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_4325_d1b7382fd3888ad718b5a9c90a68d2f5.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tabriz</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Modern Psychological Researches</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2322-3340</Issn>
				<Volume>3</Volume>
				<Issue>12</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2009</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Survey of Overgeneral Autobiographical Memory and Latency in Memories Retrieval in Depressive and Anxious Individuals</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Survey of Overgeneral Autobiographical Memory and Latency in Memories Retrieval in Depressive and Anxious Individuals</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>123</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>138</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">4326</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Touraj</FirstName>
					<LastName>Hashemi</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Majid</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mahmoud Aliloo</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mansour</FirstName>
					<LastName>Bayrami</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Masoumeh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Esmaeeli</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Akram</FirstName>
					<LastName>Arji</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>27</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The present study attempts to investigate overgeneral autobiographical memory and latency in memories retrieval in depression and anxious individuals. Along this aim, 10 depressive, 10 anxious and 10 normal individuals were selected among clients of Tabriz university counseling center .For measuring of variables, were used the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) ,Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), retrieval of Autobiographical Memory Test (AMT). To compare the means of overgeneral, latency and rates of recall positive and negative memories among of depressive, anxious and normal individuals were used Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), the Tukeys test and Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA). The results revealed that over general in autobiographical memory for depressive individuals is more than anxious and normal ones. In addition, latency in memories retrieval in depressive individuals is more than anxious and normal individuals. And depressive and anxious individuals recall more negative memories and less positive memories than normal individuals.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The present study attempts to investigate overgeneral autobiographical memory and latency in memories retrieval in depression and anxious individuals. Along this aim, 10 depressive, 10 anxious and 10 normal individuals were selected among clients of Tabriz university counseling center .For measuring of variables, were used the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) ,Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), retrieval of Autobiographical Memory Test (AMT). To compare the means of overgeneral, latency and rates of recall positive and negative memories among of depressive, anxious and normal individuals were used Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), the Tukeys test and Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA). The results revealed that over general in autobiographical memory for depressive individuals is more than anxious and normal ones. In addition, latency in memories retrieval in depressive individuals is more than anxious and normal individuals. And depressive and anxious individuals recall more negative memories and less positive memories than normal individuals.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Autobiographical memory</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Latency</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">depression</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Anxiety</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://psychologyj.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_4326_0152c68c74978bffacc0974074f790ae.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>

<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tabriz</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Modern Psychological Researches</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2322-3340</Issn>
				<Volume>3</Volume>
				<Issue>12</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2009</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Relationship between Perception or Social Constructive Learning Environment and Thinking Styles with Deep Approach to Learning and Learning out Comes</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Relationship between Perception or Social Constructive Learning Environment and Thinking Styles with Deep Approach to Learning and Learning out Comes</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>139</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>171</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">4327</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Yamini</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Parvin</FirstName>
					<LastName>Kadivar</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Valiollah</FirstName>
					<LastName>Farzad</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Alireza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Moradi</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>27</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>Goals: The goals of this study are to examine the relationships between students&#039; perception of social constructive learning environment with their thinking style, learning approach and learning outcomes.
Methodology: This study is a correlational study which uses regression and path analysis to find the effect of differences in learning style and learning approach in the relationship between students&#039; perception of social constructive learning environment and learning outcomes. The number of students who participated in this study was 277 students of mathematics, science, and engineering in the University of Mashhad. Among these subjects were 193 female and 84 male students.
Findings: This study shows that student&#039;s perception of learning environment are related to their learning outcomes, and students with different learning style and learning approach, despite perceptions of social constructive learning environment, show different learning outcomes.
Results: The results of this study indicated that although the social constructive learning environment is a satisfying environment for the students and can influence their learning outcome, students with learning style 1 and deep learning approach, reach better learning outcomes.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">Goals: The goals of this study are to examine the relationships between students&#039; perception of social constructive learning environment with their thinking style, learning approach and learning outcomes.
Methodology: This study is a correlational study which uses regression and path analysis to find the effect of differences in learning style and learning approach in the relationship between students&#039; perception of social constructive learning environment and learning outcomes. The number of students who participated in this study was 277 students of mathematics, science, and engineering in the University of Mashhad. Among these subjects were 193 female and 84 male students.
Findings: This study shows that student&#039;s perception of learning environment are related to their learning outcomes, and students with different learning style and learning approach, despite perceptions of social constructive learning environment, show different learning outcomes.
Results: The results of this study indicated that although the social constructive learning environment is a satisfying environment for the students and can influence their learning outcome, students with learning style 1 and deep learning approach, reach better learning outcomes.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Thinking style</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Learning approach</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Learning outcome</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Perception of social</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Constructive Learning environment</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://psychologyj.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_4327_53248aba7e55ba292f39c58e2c3a5e8b.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
