<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tabriz</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Modern Psychological Researches</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2322-3340</Issn>
				<Volume>8</Volume>
				<Issue>30</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2013</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>23</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Comparison of Social Competence and Academic Self Efficacy of Special Needs Students in Three Methods of Integrational, Exceptional and Normal Education</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Comparison of Social Competence and Academic Self Efficacy of Special Needs Students in Three Methods of Integrational, Exceptional and Normal Education</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>205</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>224</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">4257</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Touraj</FirstName>
					<LastName>Hashemi</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Naser</FirstName>
					<LastName>Beirami</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The present research aimed at the comparison of social competence and academic self efficacy of special needs students in three current methods in country. This education is doing in methods of integrational, exceptional and normal. The method of study was causal-comparative. For this reason samples were selected from 3 groups of integrational education، exceptional education (67 subjects in each group) and normal education students (30 subjects in this group) and inventoris of social competence (SCRQ) and Academic self efficacy was administrated to 3 groups. The results were analyzed using one way and multivariate analysis of variance and indicated that exceptional education method more effective than two other methods. Therefore، the purposes of integrational method haven’t done.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The present research aimed at the comparison of social competence and academic self efficacy of special needs students in three current methods in country. This education is doing in methods of integrational, exceptional and normal. The method of study was causal-comparative. For this reason samples were selected from 3 groups of integrational education، exceptional education (67 subjects in each group) and normal education students (30 subjects in this group) and inventoris of social competence (SCRQ) and Academic self efficacy was administrated to 3 groups. The results were analyzed using one way and multivariate analysis of variance and indicated that exceptional education method more effective than two other methods. Therefore، the purposes of integrational method haven’t done.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Social Competence</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Academic self efficacy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Special needs students</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Integrated education</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Exceptional education</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Normal education</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://psychologyj.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_4257_cb5eacfbb506c59f98d84b5836415c7b.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
