<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tabriz</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Modern Psychological Researches</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2322-3340</Issn>
				<Volume>5</Volume>
				<Issue>20</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2011</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Psychometric Characteristic of Revised Moral Authority Scale</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Psychometric Characteristic of Revised Moral Authority Scale</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>149</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>168</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">4187</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Hadi</FirstName>
					<LastName>Keramati</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Parvin</FirstName>
					<LastName>Kadivar</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Valiollah</FirstName>
					<LastName>Farzad</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Seyyedmahmood</FirstName>
					<LastName>Gazi Tabatabayi</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2015</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>19</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This study aimed to analyze the validity and reliability of Revised Moral Authority Scale (MRS-R). 652 Students of High school Ardabil (320 Femals, 332 Males) were selected by multi-stage sampling method and completed Revised Moral Authority Scale (MAS-R). Exploratory Factor analysis and internal consistency were used to compute the Revised Moral Authority Scale (MRS-R) factor structure (construct validity) and reliability, respectively. Cronbach’s Coefficients indicated that both factors and the sub factors of Revised Moral Authority Scale (MAS-R) were highly reliable. Also, the results of the exploratory factor analysis indicated four factors in this scale .In general, Revised Moral Authority Scale is a valid and reliable scale for studying Moral Authority&lt;em&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">This study aimed to analyze the validity and reliability of Revised Moral Authority Scale (MRS-R). 652 Students of High school Ardabil (320 Femals, 332 Males) were selected by multi-stage sampling method and completed Revised Moral Authority Scale (MAS-R). Exploratory Factor analysis and internal consistency were used to compute the Revised Moral Authority Scale (MRS-R) factor structure (construct validity) and reliability, respectively. Cronbach’s Coefficients indicated that both factors and the sub factors of Revised Moral Authority Scale (MAS-R) were highly reliable. Also, the results of the exploratory factor analysis indicated four factors in this scale .In general, Revised Moral Authority Scale is a valid and reliable scale for studying Moral Authority&lt;em&gt;.&lt;/em&gt;</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Psychometric</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Moral Authority</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Validity</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">reliability</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Exploratory factor analysis</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://psychologyj.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_4187_a6731f4c7d39f13e6729fcfeaa4cf38a.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
