سنجش باورهای ضمنی افسردگی با روش ارزیابی ارتباطی ضمنی (IRAP): مطالعه‌ای بر اساس مدل بسط و انسجام ارتباطی (REC)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد گروه روانشناسی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران

2 دانشجوی دکترای روانشناسی، دانشگاه تبریز، تبریز، ایران (نویسنده مسئول) Email:iesa.hekmati@gmail.com

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر ارزیابی توانایی IRAP در اندازه­گیری باورهای ضمنی افسردگی بود. بدین منظور، 50 دانشجو به صورت هدفمند انتخاب و ابزارهای پژوهش، شامل پرسشنامه آمیختگی شناختی (CFQ)، پرسشنامه افسردگی بک (BDI-II) و IRAP افسردگی، بر روی آنها اجرا شد. داده­های 4 نفر به­دلیل عدم رعایت شرط صحت IRAP کنار گذاشته شده و سپس داده­ها تحلیل شدند. نتایج نشان داد آزمودنی­ها در کوشش­های نوع 1 (من-مثبت) و نوع 2 (من-منفی) DIRAP مثبت و در کوشش نوع 3 (دیگران-مثبت) و 4 (دیگران-منفی) DIRAP منفی کسب کرده­اند؛ این یافته­ها نشانگر سرعت پاسخ­دهی متفاوت ارتباط­دهی محرک­های منفی و مثبت به­خود و دیگران است. هم­چنین اثر IRAP کل نیز مثبت (بزرگ­تر از صفر) است (34/0=DIRAP Overall) و نشانگر نگرش مثبت­تر نسبت به­خود در مقایسه با دیگران است. نتایج تحلیل واریانس اندازه­گیری مکرر معنادای تفاوت­ها را تأیید کرد (01/0<p). هم­چنین نتایج نشان داد آمیختگی شناختی با اثر IRAP کوشش­های نوع 1 همبستگی منفی دارد (01/0<p)، اما آمیختگی با سایر اثر IRAP کوشش­ها و هم­چنین افسردگی با هیچ­کدام از نوع کوشش­ها رابطه معنادار نداشت. یافته­ها نشانگر توانایی این ابزار در اندازه­گیری باورهای ضمنی مرتبط با افسردگی است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of Depressive Beliefs by Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP): A study based on Relational Elaboration and Coherence (REC) Model

نویسندگان [English]

  • Jalil Babapour 1
  • Abbas Bakhshipour 1
  • Hamid Poursharifi 1
  • Issa Hekmati 2
1 Ph.D, Professor, Psychology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
2 Ph.D, Student Educational Psychology, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran, (Corresponding Author), Email:iesa.hekmati@gmail.com
منابع
قلی­زاده، حسین (1387). برازش تجربی نظریه همخوانی استرس و سبک­های شخصیتی جامعه گرایی و خودگردانی در بیماران افسرده. پایان­نامه کارشناسی ارشد روانشناسی بالینی، دانشگاه تبریز.
هاشمی، زهره؛ محمودعلیلو، مجید و تورج هاشمی نصرت آبادی (1390). اثر بخشی درمان فراشناختی در کاهش علایم افسردگی و باورهای فراشناختی بیماران مبتلا به افسردگی اساسی (مطالعه موردی). تحقیقات علوم رفتاری، دوره 9، 2: 133- 140.
Abramson, L.Y., Alloy, L.B., Hankin, B.L., Haeffel, G.J., MacCoon, D.G., & Gibb, B.E. (2002). Cognitive vulnerability-stress models of depression in a self-regulatory and psychobiological context. In I. H. Gotlib, & C.L. Hammen (Eds.), Handbook of depression (pp. 268-294). New York: Guilford.
Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Power, P., Hayden, E., Milne, R., & Stewart, I. (2006). Do you really know what you believe? Developing the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) as a Direct Measure of Implicit Beliefs. The Irish Psychologist, 32 (7): 169-177.
Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Stewart, I., & Boles, S. (2010). A sketch of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) and the Relational Elaboration and Coherence (REC) model. The Psychological Record, 60: 527–542.
Barnes-Holmes, D., Foody, M., Barnes-Holmes, D., McHugh, L. (2013). Advances in Research on Deictic Relations and Perspective-Taking. In S. Dymond and B, Roche (Eds), Advances in Relational Frame Theory: Research and Application (pp. 127-151). Oakland: New Harbinger Publications, Inc.
Barnes-Holmes, D., Hayden, E., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Stewart, I. (2008). The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) as a Response-Time and Event -Related-Potentials Methodology for Testing Natural Verb al Relations: A Preliminary Study. The Psychological Record, 58: 497-516.
Barnes-Holmes, D., Murphy, A., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Stewart, I. (2010). The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP): Exploring the impact of private versus public contexts and the response latency criterion on pro-White and anti-Black stereotyping among white Irish individuals. The Psychological Record, 60: 57–66.
Campbell, C., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Stewart, I. (2011). Exploring screen presentations in the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP). International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 11(3): 377-388.
Carpenter, K. M., Martinez, D., Vadhan, N. L., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Nunes, E. V. (2012). Performance based measures of attentional bias and relational responding are associated with behavioural treatment outcome for cocaine dependence. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 38(2): 146–154.
Cullen, C., Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Stewart, I. (2009). The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) and the malleability of ageist attitudes. The Psychological Record, 59: 591–620.
Dawson, D.L., Barnes-Holmes, D., Gresswell, D.M., Hart, A.J.P., & Gore, N.J. (2009). Assessing the implicit beliefs of sexual offenders using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure: A first study. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 21: 57–75.
De Houwer, J. (2006). What are implicit measures and why are we using them. In R.W. Wiers, & A.W. Stacy (Eds.), Handbook of implicit cognition and addiction (pp. 11–28). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
De Houwer, J., & Moors, A. (2012). How to define and examine implicit processes? In R. Proctor & J. Capaldi (Eds.). Implicit and explicit processes in the psychology of science (pp.183-198). Oxford University Press.
De Houwer, J., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (in press). What is cognition? A functional cognitive perspective. In Steven C. Hayes and Stefan G. Hofmann (Eds.), Core Processes of Cognitive Behavioral Therapies. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.
Dixon, M.R., Rehfeldt, R.A., Zlomke, K.R., & Robinson, A. (2006). Exploring the development and dismantling of equivalence classes involving terrorist stimuli. Psychological Record, 56: 83–103.
Drake, C.E., Kellum, K. K., Wilson, K. G., Luoma, J. B., Weinstein, J. H., & Adams, C. H. (2010). Examining the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure: Four pilot studies. The Psychological Record, 60: 81–100.
Farrell, L., Cochrane, A., & McHugh, L. (2015). Exploring attitudes towards gender and science: The advantages of an IRAP approach versus the IAT. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 4 (2): 121-128.
Ghassemzadeh, H., Mojtabai, R., Karamghadiri, N., & ebrahimkhani, N. (2005). Psychometric properties of a Persian language version of the beck depression inventory-second edition: BDI-II-Persian. Journal of Depresses & Anxiety, 2: 185-192.
Gillanders, D.T., Bolderston, H., Bond, F.W., Dempster, M., Flaxman, P.E., Campbell, L. & et al (2014). The Development and Initial Validation of the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire. Behavior Therapy, 45: 83–101.
Golijani-Moghaddam, N., Hart, A., Dawson, D.L. (2013). The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure: Emerging reliability and validity data. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 2: 105-119.
Gotlib, I. H., & Neubauer, D. L. (2000). Information-processing approaches to the study of cognitive biases in depression. In S. L. Johnson, A. M. Hayes, T.M. Field, N. Schneiderman, & P. M. McCabe (Eds.), Stress, coping, and depression. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Haeffel, G.J., Abramson, L.Y., Brazy, P.C., Shah, J.Y., Teachman, B.A., & Nosek, B.A. (2007). Explicit and Implicit Cognition: A preliminary test of a dual-process theory of cognitive vulnerability to depression. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45: 1155-1167.
Hayes S.C, & Barnes-Holmes D. (2004). Relational Operants: Processes and implications: A response to Palmer's review of Relational Frame Theory. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 82: 213–224.
Hayes, S.C., Fox, E., Gifford, E.V., Wilson, K.G., Barnes-Holmes, D. & Healy, O. (2001). Derived relational responding as learned behavior. In S.C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes & B. Roche (Eds.) Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 21-51). New York: Plenum Press.
Hayes, S.C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational Frame Theory: A Post-Skinnerian Account of Human Language and Cognition. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hayes, S.C., Strosahl, K.D., & Wilson, K.G. (2012). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: The Process and Practice of Mindful Change (second Edition). New York: Guilford Press.
Hughes, S., Barnes-Holmes, D. (2013). A Functional Approach to the Study of Implicit Cognition:  The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) and the Relational Elaboration and Coherence (REC) Model. In S. Dymond, & B. Roche, (Eds). Advances in Relational Frame Theory Research and Application (97-127). Oakland: New Harbinger Publications, Inc.
Hughes, S., Barnes-Holmes, D. (2016a). Relational Frame Theroy: the basic account. In R. D. Zettle, S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holes, & A. Biglan  (Eds). The Wiely Handbokk of Contextual Behavioral Science (129-179). Chichester, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
Hughes, S., Barnes-Holmes, D. (2016b). Relational Frame Theory Implications for the Study of Human Language and Cognition. In R. D. Zettle, S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holes, & A. Biglan  (Eds). The Wiely Handbokk of Contextual Behavioral Science (179-227). Chichester, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
Hughes, S., Barnes‐Holmes, D., & Vahey, N. (2012). Holding on to our functional roots when exploring new intellectual islands: A voyage through implicit cognition research. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 1: 17–38.
Hussey, I. (2014). User Manual for IRAP. Retrieved from: www.IRAPresearch.org, 2015.
Hussey, I., Barnes-Holmes, D. (2012). The implicit relational assessment procedure as a measure of implicit depression and the role of psychological flexibility. Cognitive Behavioral Practice, 19:573-582.
Hussey, I., Barnes-Holmes, D. (2012). The implicit relational assessment procedure as a measure of implicit depression and the role of psychological flexibility. Cognitive Behavioral Practice, 19: 573-582.
Hussey, I., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2015). From Relational Frame Theory to implicit attitudes and back again: clarifying the link between RFT and IRAP research. Current Opinion in Psychology, 2: 11–15.
Hussey, I., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Booth, R. (2016). Individuals with current suicidal ideation demonstrate implicit “fearlessness of death”. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 51: 1-9.
Hussey, I., Thompson, M., McEnteggart, Barnes-Holmes, D., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2015). Interpreting and inverting with less cursing: A guide to interpreting IRAP data. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 4 (3): 157–162.
Konses, L., Whelan, R., O’Donovan, A., McHugh, L.A. (2013). Implicit measurement of positive and negative future thinking as a predictor of depressive symptoms and hopelessness. Consciousness and Cognition, 22: 989-912.
Murphy, C., Hussey, T, Barnes-Holmes, D., & Kelly, M.E. (2015). The Implicit Relational Assessment procedure (IRAP) and attractiveness bias. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 4 (4):292–299.
Nicholson, E., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2012). The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) as a measure of spider fear. The Psychological Record, 62: 263–278.
Nicholson, E., McCourt, A., Barnes-Holmes, D. (2013). The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) as a measure of obsessive beliefs in relation to disgust. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 2: 23-30.
Perugini, M., Richetin, J., & Zogmaister, C. (2010). Prediction of behavior. In: B. Gawronski, & K. Payne (Eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 255–277). New York: Guilford pp.
Power, P.M., Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Stewart, I. (2009). The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) as a measure of implicit relative preferences: A first study. The Psychological Record, 59: 621–640.
Quinones, J.L., & Hayes, S.C. (2014). Relational coherence in ambiguous and unambiguous relational networks. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101: 76-93.
Remue, J., De Houwer, J., Barnes-Holmes, D., Vanderhasselt, M.A., De Raedt, R. (2013). Self-esteem revisited: Performance on the implicit relational assessment procedure as a measure of self-versus ideal self-related cognitions in dysphoria. Cognition & Emotion, 27: 1441–1449.

Remue, J., Hughes, S., De Houver, J., De Raedt, R. (2014). To Be or Want to Be: Disentangling the Role of Actual versus Ideal Self in Implicit Self-Esteem. PLoS ONE 9 (9): e108837.

Roche, B., Ruiz, M., O’Riordan, M., & Hand, K. (2005). A relational frame approach to the psychological assessment of sex offenders. In M. Taylor & E. Quayle (eds.), Viewing child pornography on the internet: Understanding the offense, managing the offender, and helping the victims (pp. 109–125). Dorset, UK: Russell House Publishing.
Roddy, S., Stewart, I., & Barnes-Holmes’, D. (2011). Facial reactions reveal that slim is good but fat is not bad: Implicit and explicit measures of body size bias. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(6): 488–494.
Roefs, A., Huijding, J., Smulders, F.T.Y., MacLeod, M.L., Jong, P.J., Wiers, R.W., Jansen, A.T. M. (2011). Implicit Measures of Association in Psychopathology Research. Psychological Bulletin, 137 (1): 149–193.
Slattery, B., & Stewart, I. (2014). Hierarchical classification as relational framing. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101: 61-75.
Snowden, R.J., Craig, R.L., & Gray, N.S. (2011). Indirect behavioral measures of cognition among sexual offenders. Journal of Sex Research, 48(2–3): 192–217.
Stewart, I., & McElwee, J. (2009). Relational responding and conditional discrimination procedures: An apparent inconsistency and clarification. The Behavior Analyst, 32(2): 309-317.
Stewart, I., & Roche, B. (2013). Relational Frame Theory: An Overview. In S. Dymond, & B. Roche, (Eds). Advances in Relational Frame Theory: Research and Application (pp. 51-73). Oakland: New Harbinger Publications, Inc.
Vahey, N.A., Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Stewart, I. (2009). A First Test of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure as a Measure of Self-Esteem: Irish Prisoner Groups and University Students. The Psychological Record, 59: 371–388.
Wiers, R.W., Teachman, B.A., De Houwer, J.)2007). Implicit cognitive processes in psychopathology: An introduction. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 38: 95–104.